In most cytometry labs, it's routine to process samples hours, or even days, after collection. But the clock starts ticking the moment blood is drawn. Cells degrade, populations shift, and data quality quietly erodes.
Within 72 hours of the blood draw, fresh blood samples see a:
Blood sample degradation measured across 72 hours, in three healthy donors.
Whole blood from three healthy donors was collected in sodium heparin vacutainers. Each specimen was split into eight aliquots: four for live processing and staining, and four for fixation.
We analyzed samples at time 0 (immediately after draw), 24, 48, and 72 hours after draw.
Samples designated for live processing were diluted in ACK lysis buffer to lyse red blood cells (RBC). Samples were subsequently counted, and stained with a 25-marker antibody cocktail (spectral flow cytometry). After staining, samples were fixed with 1.5% PFA and analyzed.
Analysis was performed on a 5 laser Cytek Aurora spectral flow cytometer.
Spectral flow cytometry panel design was adapted from the Cytek 25-color Immunoprofiling Assay. The final panel consists of 25 markers with unique spectral signatures and does not contain a viability stain.

Cell loss starts early and does not slow down.
Fresh blood samples see variable loss across immune cell populations, making it impossible to predict the patient's true biology at T = 0.
Missed neutrophils lead to distorted immune profiles that inflate T, B, NK, and dendritic cell frequencies.
.gif)
When cells die or surface markers decay, immune profiles shift, creating results that reflect technical variation rather than a patient's true biology.
Degraded samples often fail QC, requiring costly redraws, repeat shipments, and delays in data delivery.
Differences in how long samples sit before processing introduce noise, making it harder to detect real pharmacodynamic signals or validate biomarkers.
See this data, compared to the results of samples fixed with TokuKit, in our published whitepaper.